|
Post by X on Aug 15, 2013 12:16:02 GMT -5
Not on private property. If it's state land, which we don't play on, you would need an ORV sticker which is like $10 and you can tow the vehicle to the game. Otherwise if its driving there you obviously need insurance and registration. The only thing you have to worry about is if you hit someone on the field and they sue you.
Sent from my DROID RAZR using proboards
|
|
|
Post by Puma1 on Aug 15, 2013 12:24:26 GMT -5
Hey X. Not to be 'that' guy... No limits is actually a state park.
I think it would be nice to see some more vehicles around. i also think we'd have to make some rules on how to kill them other than launchers, because 99% of us don't have one.
|
|
|
Post by M.S.-ARC on Aug 15, 2013 12:41:13 GMT -5
Hey X. Not to be 'that' guy... No limits is actually a state park. I think it would be nice to see some more vehicles around. i also think we'd have to make some rules on how to kill them other than launchers, because 99% of us don't have one. No limits is a city park owned by the city of Taylor. It is not a state park. So you just became "that guy". The rules on how to kill vehicles have pretty much been established for a while now. If you don't have the means the kill a vehicle then that sucks for you. Launchers and rockets are pretty cheap these days.
|
|
|
Post by Pagan on Aug 15, 2013 12:43:54 GMT -5
Hey X. Not to be 'that' guy... No limits is actually a state park. I think it would be nice to see some more vehicles around. i also think we'd have to make some rules on how to kill them other than launchers, because 99% of us don't have one. It's a City park.
|
|
|
Post by Ogre on Aug 15, 2013 12:48:04 GMT -5
Hey X. Not to be 'that' guy... No limits is actually a state park. I think it would be nice to see some more vehicles around. i also think we'd have to make some rules on how to kill them other than launchers, because 99% of us don't have one. EDIT: Awww its a city park? That being said, if anyone ever wins the powerball, please rent out a state park for a weekend and have a COLOSSAL milsim. Also puma, my thoughs on killing them without a laucher would be a few shots to the engine block with anything that would be a "large" caliber weapon (airsoft replica who's real world counterpart would shoot a 7.62 x 51mm/ .308 round) EDIT: My reasoning is if you put few M14 rounds through an ATV it's gonna do enough damage to stop it depending on where you hit it, while even larger calibers would stop it dead in it's tracks.
|
|
Sandbur
New Member
Who Dares Wins
Posts: 419
|
Post by Sandbur on Aug 15, 2013 12:54:51 GMT -5
Also puma, my thoughs on killing them without a laucher would be a few shots to the engine block with anything that would be a "large" caliber weapon (airsoft replica who's real world counterpart would shoot a 7.62 x 51mm/ .308 round) I don't see that being an effective alternative. It would be very hard for those in the vehicle to discern 'heavy caliber' shots from regular shots. A rocket hitting the side of a vehicle is pretty easy to confirm.
|
|
|
Post by Ogre on Aug 15, 2013 12:56:54 GMT -5
Also puma, my thoughs on killing them without a laucher would be a few shots to the engine block with anything that would be a "large" caliber weapon (airsoft replica who's real world counterpart would shoot a 7.62 x 51mm/ .308 round) I don't see that being an effective alternative. It would be very hard for those in the vehicle to discern 'heavy caliber' shots from regular shots. A rocket hitting the side of a vehicle is pretty easy to confirm. I get how it would be hard to discern that, I was more or less answering puma, not saying it is effective, I agree the most effective would be a launcher of some sorts.
|
|
|
Post by M.S.-ARC on Aug 15, 2013 12:57:06 GMT -5
Also puma, my thoughs on killing them without a laucher would be a few shots to the engine block with anything that would be a "large" caliber weapon (airsoft replica who's real world counterpart would shoot a 7.62 x 51mm/ .308 round) I don't see that being an effective alternative. It would be very hard for those in the vehicle to discern 'heavy caliber' shots from regular shots. A rocket hitting the side of a vehicle is pretty easy to confirm. I was about to say the same thing. Doesn't matter what type of gun it is. Chances are it's still shooting 6mm bb's and as a vehicle operator, there's no way of knowing that a certain bb came from a specific replica. Rockets leave nothing to be confused about. When it hits, you know it.
|
|
|
Post by Priest (Immortal) on Aug 15, 2013 14:17:21 GMT -5
I don't see that being an effective alternative. It would be very hard for those in the vehicle to discern 'heavy caliber' shots from regular shots. A rocket hitting the side of a vehicle is pretty easy to confirm. I was about to say the same thing. Doesn't matter what type of gun it is. Chances are it's still shooting 6mm bb's and as a vehicle operator, there's no way of knowing that a certain bb came from a specific replica. Rockets leave nothing to be confused about. When it hits, you know it. Plus let's not leave out the part about how firing a rocket into a vehicles windshield from 250+ feet out and hearing your team cheer you on makes you tear up a bit...... Haha!! And firing those rockets are fun as hell too!!
|
|
|
Post by X on Aug 15, 2013 16:46:17 GMT -5
Hey X. Not to be 'that' guy... No limits is actually a state park. I think it would be nice to see some more vehicles around. i also think we'd have to make some rules on how to kill them other than launchers, because 99% of us don't have one. It's a City park. Besides that no limits is too small for vehicles. So your argument is double null. It is a nullossal failure. Sent from my DROID RAZR using proboards
|
|
|
Post by Puma1 on Aug 15, 2013 16:57:12 GMT -5
Alright, well sorry for being that guy. Just saying, even city parks require licensing right? And yes, I know it's too small. Just wanted to say that we don't only play on private land.
|
|
|
Post by X on Aug 15, 2013 17:14:46 GMT -5
I don't see that being an effective alternative. It would be very hard for those in the vehicle to discern 'heavy caliber' shots from regular shots. A rocket hitting the side of a vehicle is pretty easy to confirm. Rockets leave nothing to be confused about. When it hits, you know it. Take it from me (the guy that drove the truck for two days) even rockets are easy to miss. I rely on the guys in back to physically see a rocket hit us. Half the time I didn't hear or see a rocket. When you have radios chattering, aegs whining, and dudes yelling you can barely hear it, if you hear it at all. My point being only rockets should count. I also believe that their should be a minimum velocity requirement, but I'm sure that's just me. Launchers that shoot rockets slower than I can throw them shouldn't count. Put some engineering into that shit man. Priest knows what I'm talking about. Sent from my DROID RAZR using proboards
|
|
Lone Wolf
New Member
I am the wolf and the pray is mine
Posts: 163
|
Post by Lone Wolf on Aug 16, 2013 12:23:05 GMT -5
I would think that the any vehicle in Michigan would need proper licensing and permits for off-road and on-road travel. Imsure it would. Unless if its on private property???
|
|
|
Post by Soulless(Previously Lucipher) on Aug 16, 2013 12:32:46 GMT -5
Nah i think even if its on private property im sure it would have to have licensing, my mom works for a city in michigan and has to decide licensing and stuff for buildings and permits so i have a jist on this sort of thing.
|
|
Lone Wolf
New Member
I am the wolf and the pray is mine
Posts: 163
|
Post by Lone Wolf on Aug 16, 2013 13:41:17 GMT -5
It deffinatly would have to be registerd thats for sure. Could you do alittle more backround on that and see? I wouldnt know where to even start
|
|