|
Post by Gestapo on Aug 22, 2005 2:30:33 GMT -5
airsoftbro, you can edit your posts so you dont have to double post.
|
|
|
Post by DevilDog on Aug 22, 2005 8:40:39 GMT -5
I haven't seen it yet. I was told this info by one of my wholesalers last week or so.... He had the opprotunity to fire one. As soon as I get some more info, and pics, on it I'll post it here!
|
|
|
Post by trauby on Aug 22, 2005 12:30:03 GMT -5
I must disagree in some aspects: UHC spring pistols have pretty good performance compared to more generic material, like my M9 worked pretty flawlessly up until I broke a field stripping pin fiddling around with it too much. This was after around one or two years without any problems, so it should last you a fair amount of time, versus a friend's HFC P8 which broke within a few weeks. I believe the case is that UHC basically copies Marui designs. Also, the auto hardball (Cybergun) seems to be pretty decent for what you pay for: a pump action shotty that isn't astronomically expensive like TM's models. That being said, perhaps the new Super 9 will be a copy of the VSR 10, and should have better performance as such? We can really only speculate until it comes out. In conclusion- for the most part, you get what you pay for. Sure we can rag on the lower end of the spectrum of airsoft guns, but they are what they are - lacking in quality sometimes, but cheap. No offense but if you had good results off of UHC springer pistols, you got the best models that I know of that they have (colt 1911 and the berretta) and that's not saying a lot. KWC's lines of springers are far more accurate and actually shoot over 200fps. As far as getting what you pay for I see that as incorrect since you can get so much for your money than a super 9 or any UHC gun. They might have a few descent models but it is not worth it at all. This is coming from my buying experience and having shop access. You don't have to trust me but you'd be far better off if you stay away from them.
|
|
|
Post by Psychosis on Aug 22, 2005 18:40:37 GMT -5
1) You are probably right
2) As far as I know, we are both right - guns under $100 are usually not a safe bet save maybe the UTG clones of Maruzen shotties. You pay $20 for a UHC, HFC, Cybergun, whatever it is springer, you pay for garbage for the most part, but garbage you can work with for a little while. However, if your point is that you can do better with the small sum of money you pay for a KWC vs. a UHC, then you are probably right. I think my point is more general, that people won't mind cheaping out.
|
|