|
Post by Mosin on Mar 3, 2008 18:45:34 GMT -5
..We all know you want to be like us RAGE boys Kidding, but yeah. I've got some Urbans you can rock if you want.
|
|
|
Post by OnSlaught on Mar 3, 2008 18:48:42 GMT -5
Man I'm so pumped to play on the new field!
|
|
|
Post by operatordoc01 on Mar 3, 2008 18:53:56 GMT -5
Dahm, Get over yourself. There is going to be no exception for you on this. Team RAGE and a few others that where asked by MIRAGE are playing as the SAS and will be the only ones in Multi-Cam.
You just need to get over this and let it go. I have done the same thing for Rolling thunder. Made MC's a Restricted Unfirm for a Invite Team Only. This is the event hosters choice if they want to do this. So just back off man, give it a rest, get over it, let it go, stop living in the past, live in the now.
|
|
|
Post by Tex on Mar 3, 2008 19:25:05 GMT -5
You guys really are making this a lot more trouble then it should be. I dont see why a simple accommodation could be made for us who wear Mutlicam. I think it was a bad idea to choose such a popular camouflage for a "restricted" team. Or, you can take some of your grandfathers inheritance money that you bragged about and buy some $30 Woodlands?
|
|
Yingyang
New Member
These Schnozberries tastes like Schnozberries!
Posts: 182
|
Post by Yingyang on Mar 3, 2008 20:01:18 GMT -5
Hey hey let's not bash anyone too much, this IS a thread for an event, not a flame fest.
I think we have settled that no one is allowed to wear MC unless they have been invited.
Dahm, I have extra stuff but it won't match, I'll talk to you on AIM about it or in person tomorrow.
|
|
|
Post by Tex on Mar 3, 2008 20:05:06 GMT -5
Hey put me down for cuban guerillas, I assume my chinese woodland digital camo counts as woodland Were it a different OP, that may be true, however, we're cracking down on Camo requirements at MOA, having too many instances of people being confused about who is on whose team. So, a friendly reminder to everyone... If you plan on showing up in anything other than the following camo's expect to be asked to play in civies with a primarily black color. Other than that, you WILL NOT play with camo not listed as an option. I am sorry but this is the way it is going to be. There will be absolutely no discussion on this and posts will be deleted if anyone attempts to. Rules are rules.Cuban Military - Desert, DARPAT, ACU, White, Black Guerillas - Woodland, MARPAT
|
|
KCO
New Member
Posts: 25
|
Post by KCO on Mar 3, 2008 20:29:24 GMT -5
Why does team rage get to be the only SAS thats kind of gay! Since when are op teams made up solely of one airsoft team. That is an unfair advantage to the other teams....I hope I dont have to explain why. Even if you are sponcering the event it does not matter, your getting PAID to host a fun and as close to fair game as possible. If you are trying to set up a game where a team gets to use all of their equipement and communication assets to completely dominate a situation then it should be a free game. Thats just my opinion, members from my team and I will not be going to this game unless these rules are changed. Also you should still post "field requirements" because some people are new and not everyone is familure with them.
|
|
|
Post by operatordoc01 on Mar 3, 2008 20:39:26 GMT -5
Why does team rage get to be the only SAS thats kind of gay! Since when are op teams made up solely of one airsoft team. That is an unfair advantage to the other teams....I hope I dont have to explain why. Even if you are sponcering the event it does not matter, your getting PAID to host a fun and as close to fair game as possible. If you are trying to set up a game where a team gets to use all of their equipement and communication assets to completely dominate a situation then it should be a free game. Thats just my opinion, members from my team and I will not be going to this game unless these rules are changed. Also you should still post "field requirements" because some people are new and not everyone is familure with them. KCO, Let me first say that there are others that are going to be playing on the SAS team that have been invited to play on that team. Since you dont know everything that is going on I would suggest you find out first. As for the field requirements here is a link you can follow to read the rules on this field www.military-ops-airsoft.org/_mgxroot/page_10786.html
|
|
|
Post by Tex on Mar 3, 2008 20:42:59 GMT -5
KCO. The SAS team is pretty much the same damn thing as the Cubans. Even if they were their own team, I don't see how 7 people hold an advantage over 60+. Teamwork or not, it's not the movies, it doesn't work like that.
Plus, we're NOT that good. We just have fun running around together and shooting eachother. Hell, if all 7 of us went to the RISF team, and we got rid of the Spec Ops, it would be the same, and nothing would be said.
You guys are over reacting and dramatizing everything. Maybe you should read the storyline/objectives and you would learn more.
Plus, when did airsoft become about winning and losing? It's about having fun shooting eachother. Winning is not everything, it's just a nice goal to motivate a team to work together.
In closing. Chill out. There's no unfair advantage. If there was, this would have been adressed months ago. Also, I don't know how many times we have to say it, but...
WE WOULD RATHER LOSE TO SKILLED PLAYERS THAN DESTROY NEWBS.
Fine.
|
|
|
Post by Relarz on Mar 3, 2008 20:43:38 GMT -5
well, since its their op, they can do as they please. the SAS wouldnt send a 50 man contingency to a situation like the one in this scenario. they would send a small, <20 man team to operate secretly, and stealthily. and since most teams usually sign up for the same side of an op to begin with, your team should be able to use your own communication equipment without interference. they will be working loosely with the Cuban Military, and that means if they happen to be alone when say, 20 something guerillas come, then they are "fucked".
on another note, dahm, i dont see what the big deal is.
a.) you obviously have enough money to go get some other cheap form of camo. you wouldnt put all your money on a not-so-popular horse, so why would you expect to be able to wear multicam to EVERY event you go to? if you are really that tight on your pocketbook's strings, then just wear some civies and prepare to "vive le resistance!"
b.) they don't have to make exceptions for you, me, or anyone. the more you bitch about it, the more it will anger them.
i expect to have a GRAND old time. big fields = relish's hyperactive playground.
|
|
|
Post by Kiki on Mar 3, 2008 20:49:13 GMT -5
Just a quick question:
Are future events held at the MOA field going to be this restricted? I (again) don't mean to sound bitchy, but this is quite possibly the most retarded thing I've heard in months. Why are these camo restrictions getting so tight? Is it that big of a deal? At rec games you simply use different colored armbands, and that works fine. Yes, this isn't a rec game, but it's not a completely MIL-SIM Op like Rolling Thunder coming up. I wouldn't be bitching about camo requirements for a real MIL-SIM Op like that, but this is just another game.
All I ask is that you let use wear armbands or something of the sort. I'm not asking to be on the SAS team, I don't want to be on that team (no offense personally). I'd like to play on the Guerillas or Cubans, or whatever. I just want to play in the gear that I've bought specifically for playing in. Why did I buy multicam if I'm never going to be able to use it?
So basically I don't think it would be too hard to let two people (one of which is only wearing mc pants, and just an OD top) wear armbands or something of the sort to signify that we are NOT a part of the SAS team.
Think about it logically and reasonably before responding with the bs "It's the rules".
|
|
|
Post by Tex on Mar 3, 2008 20:54:12 GMT -5
Look. The next 2 events Multicam is restricted. The one after than, is not. That will not be changed. Also, didn't I just say, this is not open for discussion? It's a rule, that is set in stone.
The previous op was hell on figuring out who was on what team, and that is changing. I will not have that happen again. So, to make it so that does not happen... VOILA - Camo REQUIREMENTS.
Follow them or don't come. Civilians with black as a primary color (jeans are acceptable pants) is an option if you don't have the listed cammies.
STOP POSTING ON THIS, IT WILL NOT CHANGE.
|
|
|
Post by Relarz on Mar 3, 2008 21:03:54 GMT -5
Why did I buy multicam if I'm never going to be able to use it? dude, its one op. you should have more than just one set anyway. people want all sorts of milsim and stuff, but when it comes down to the restriction of camo's people fly off their hinges. if you go to a real combat zone, each side is only going to be wearing their respective camo's, unless one side is a rag-tag rebel group, or if its a joint action, NATO-style.
|
|
Asylum72
New Member
A.T.O's lead finger
Posts: 10
|
Post by Asylum72 on Mar 3, 2008 21:20:29 GMT -5
All camo arguements aside, I cant wait for the night battle, the A.T.O has made a unique little game made for night games. I'm willing to give the rules and details if Doc wants it for consideration for the night games.
|
|
|
Post by Thor on Mar 3, 2008 21:25:36 GMT -5
I personally have 4 sets of camo, just so I can go to several ops.
ACU's Multicam Woodland OD
It's not that expensive really, especially if you buy surplus stuff. There's no reason why everyone shouldn't have WOODLAND at least, it was the standard US camo for 20 some years. You can find a set for like, 50 bucks used. Any big op (Thunder, Lion Claws ops, etc) has strict camo requirements. It's better to get used to them now than try and bitch about it at a bigger op. They won't fucking budge, so why should Tex? Personally, I'm all for it.
I plan on being there to have some fun and shoot tons of people. In my ACU's. Oh, and this shit about how it's not fair for team RAGE to be the SAS guys? It's THEIR fucking OP. If they want to all be on a team with a few of their buddies and wear the same cammo, fine by me. If I ever hold an OP again, I'll probably do exactly the same as Tex. 'Nuff said.
|
|