|
|
Post by bong on Apr 1, 2003 14:48:42 GMT -5
i am looking at the sig 550. or the sig 552 swat, but it looks ugly. is there anything special or bad about it that sets it apart from other TM AEGS?
|
|
|
|
Post by Jacko on Apr 1, 2003 16:54:33 GMT -5
The SIG series has 3 round burst. That's the only thing that makes them different.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spectre on Apr 2, 2003 15:29:56 GMT -5
looks ugly huh?, i dunno about the rest of you, but i've alway sthought that the Sig 550 series of rifles to be one of the best looking around....  not sure if i remember correctly or not, but doesn't TM have the mags set up like on the real thing, where they can be locked together without the use of mag clamps? [Edit] Wow, that pic sure looked a whole lot better on a white background |
|
|
|
Post by Newman on Apr 2, 2003 15:42:18 GMT -5
Yup, the mags can be clipped and unclipped quite easily. Robo used to do that with his own Sig rifle.
The G36 mags have the same mechanism and it sure does work well.
mmm mmm good @ Sig rifles.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jacko on Apr 2, 2003 16:12:32 GMT -5
I've heard that the clamping tabs on the SIG series were pretty weak and had a tendency to break, actually, but I can't verify that. (I'm anxious to see how my G36 mags hold up.)
|
|
|
|
Post by sUpEr K-@Z2-K on Apr 3, 2003 17:49:20 GMT -5
wasn't there talk that TM was going to come out with a new updated version of the SIG?
|
|
|
|
Post by Jacko on Apr 3, 2003 22:28:55 GMT -5
There was a rumor that, instead of the Colt M733, they might've released a SIG 550S next but who knows if that was ever true. :/
|
|
|
|
Post by bong on Apr 12, 2003 12:29:08 GMT -5
im saying the 552 is ugly, the 550 looks ok.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rustpot on Apr 12, 2003 13:02:44 GMT -5
I had a 550 (just sold it to a guy for parts after i busted it)
the mag clips didnt feel too bad, but i did break one of them, but i mainly didnt use them
i think all the sig 55x rifles are sweet as hell, although the only upgrades are a scope and a few others...
|
|
