|
|
Post by t9w0rd on Nov 21, 2011 22:53:07 GMT -5
Just trying to figure out which one to get. Money isn't an issue.
Anyone have any experience with one or both of these guns? I like the look of the CA better but I'm unsure if the internals are better than KWA's. I hear KWA performs well out of the box but I don't know much about the CA proline series. Any help is appreciated.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
Post by samfisher on Nov 21, 2011 23:49:33 GMT -5
KWA, look at the internal specs and you'll see the difference yourself. A bit more money than the Classic Army, but worth it IMO.
|
|
|
|
Post by t9w0rd on Nov 21, 2011 23:57:14 GMT -5
Actually the CA is more money than the KWA I have nothing else to say
|
|
|
|
Post by Dynamo on Nov 22, 2011 0:44:03 GMT -5
I haven't had any experience with CA personally, but the rumor mill has me steered clear of them for the time being. They are good platforms to build off of, but unless you're lucky, you'll have to put money into them right away (again, just off of what I've heard). KWA on the other hand, I've had plenty of experience with. I had an SR10 for a while before moving on to other styles and I loved it. Crisp trigger response, accurate, yadda yadda. Though, I've also been told that they use a few parts that may or may not be proprietary, which makes it harder to upgrade/or fix without buying original parts. Also, the rail systems are a big bitch to remove should you choose to go with a different rail.
Overall, I'm pretty confident that KWA is better out of the box. Any gun can be torn down and made to be more reliable. But if you're like me and don't want to mess with internals right when you get it, then go KWA.
|
|
xghostmakerx
New Member
For the emperor, for Tanith!
Posts: 420
|
Post by xghostmakerx on Nov 22, 2011 8:25:26 GMT -5
SR7 all the way. I use and abuse the hell out of mine and it keeps coming back for more.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ghast on Nov 22, 2011 12:59:21 GMT -5
SR7 all the way. I use and abuse the hell out of mine and it keeps coming back for more. |
|
|
|
Post by samfisher on Nov 22, 2011 21:06:24 GMT -5
Actually the CA is more money than the KWA I have nothing else to say Ahh, I was thinking the "sportsline" not the proline. So, even more reason to go with the SR7 since you can save money. |
|
|
|
Post by Carnage on Nov 22, 2011 21:41:18 GMT -5
SR7 all the way. I use and abuse the hell out of mine and it keeps coming back for more. Same here. I bought my KWA SR7 back in March(?) from a previous owner. If from what I heard is right, my SR7 is still bone stock and almost 2 years old come February. To this day, I've never had any problems and the trigger response is still great on a 9.6v. I've used it in countless CQB games and outdoor games as well. A picture of mine can be seen by looking at my avatar (*note that I have an outer barrel extension on it and it's an old picture). I've been running my SR7 with just a foregrip and sometimes a suppressor so I'm not very knowledgable about the pros and cons to upgrading and changing internal and external parts. But, I do know that it's "Engineered To Outperform" a CA out of the box. |
|
|
|
Post by Taylor Gang Or Die on Nov 24, 2011 19:41:09 GMT -5
Same here. I bought my KWA SR7 back in March(?) from a previous owner. If from what I heard is right, my SR7 is still bone stock and almost 2 years old come February. To this day, I've never had any problems and the trigger response is still great on a 9.6v. I've used it in countless CQB games and outdoor games as well. A picture of mine can be seen by looking at my avatar (*note that I have an outer barrel extension on it and it's an old picture). I've been running my SR7 with just a foregrip and sometimes a suppressor so I'm not very knowledgable about the pros and cons to upgrading and changing internal and external parts. But, I do know that it's "Engineered To Outperform" a CA out of the box. I have been behind and in front of both guns, my personal preference is the KWA. |
|
|
|
Post by Myers on Nov 29, 2011 23:26:47 GMT -5
CA sucks. I used my CA M15A4 one time before it took a shit on me. So many things went wrong with it, it was literally trash. I wouldn't recommend Classic Army at all. KWA, on the other hand, is a good choice.
|
|
|
|
Post by TheEnd on Nov 29, 2011 23:43:59 GMT -5
CA sucks. I used my CA M15A4 one time before it took a shit on me. So many things went wrong with it, it was literally trash. Wanna sell it? |
|
|
|
Post by Myers on Nov 30, 2011 0:14:48 GMT -5
Sorry TheEnd, this was years ago. Its been long gone for a while now.
|
|
helmet
New Member
Leading the charge.
Posts: 408
|
Post by helmet on Dec 2, 2011 11:49:19 GMT -5
Do the KWA KM4 SR7, I have the KWA KM4 RIS and it is amazing! Never a feed issue, no lock ups, amazing gearbox and construction, insane accuracy. You won't be disappointed. CA is great, but I have my doubts about a few of their lines...
|
|
|
|
Post by Gimpalong on Dec 2, 2011 13:37:55 GMT -5
I'd go with the KWA solely due to the excellent (in my experience) customer support that KWA USA provides. KWA rifles don't really live up to the extreme hype that surrounds them, but they are good rifles nonetheless. My perception of KWA is that they seem more concerned than other AEG companies with building guns that are sports equipment.
My KWA SR10 seemed very nicely put together and ran quite well. Had I not wanted to switch over to a weapon that is actually issued to our our armed forces I probably would have kept it.
|
|
