Post by Delta on Sept 2, 2003 18:51:45 GMT -5
I have owned or still do or at least shot aobut every TM springer out there including the MK 23 which isn't as good as the TM glock which I find the best of them all, but by far my KWC desert eagle will kill that. I can hit targets at 75 feet with my DE that I can rarely if ever hit with my glock at about 40 feet. I do agree its bulk is a flaw however the longer barrel accuracy improvement is a worthy trade off depending on your preference of play. I am a spring pistol nut, I only use spring sidearms. believe me I have tested them all. But back to the super 9, I agree any TM pistol can outperform it. So actually if you spent half the money you did on the super 9, you could have a pistol that would be more accurate and definatly more well constructed. One major flaw other than it just sucks is that the design is tacky in that almost every part has a wobble or isn't very tight. the barrel rattles and the stock is cheap and isn't well mounted to the mechanism of the gun. And no tightening the screws doesn't help, you will get a shot or two and the same story. As said before, its still a turd. Great wall piece though.