|
|
Post by snafu on Jul 30, 2013 21:32:05 GMT -5
Eagledriver, do you have any idea if they plan to sell the LBX stuff in other colors?
|
|
Zdybel
New Member
Im Zdybel Dig up old Facebook Posts bcuz im 1337
Posts: 786
|
Post by Zdybel on Jul 30, 2013 21:33:48 GMT -5
AOR3 actually exists. Its a mixture of both 1 and 2.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ogre on Jul 30, 2013 22:08:43 GMT -5
I think the glock in a box looks ugly as sin. |
|
|
|
Post by Jazzman on Jul 30, 2013 22:36:12 GMT -5
Lets stop talking about the little children's guns, and start talking about their camouflage.
In my opinion it looks like they are just trying to appeal to CODsofters, in this case MOHsofters, and get sales from the younger crowd. The camo wouldn't look so bad if the pattern was smaller, making it look less blocky. Other then that, I don't think it looks horrible.
|
|
Dingo
New Member
Posts: 42
|
Post by Dingo on Jul 31, 2013 0:19:51 GMT -5
The camo was designed to break up your figure at longer ranges, really where camo needs to be effective. At first I thought it was ugly too, but from what I've seen, it's very effective.
|
|
Joker
New Member
Posts: 111 
|
Post by Joker on Jul 31, 2013 7:20:34 GMT -5
I mean it looks pretty good for being from a game, but my concern for anyone who buys it is if they'll be able to use it at Milsims or not...
I'm going to guess they won't be able to use it, since it isn't in use in the military.
I have to admit that combat shirt actually doesn't look all too bad.
|
|
bobbunny
New Member
No long fishing.
Posts: 779
|
Post by bobbunny on Jul 31, 2013 11:40:14 GMT -5
It doesn't look too bad, but I agree on the fact that the larger patches tend to reveal them more so closer up (As far as I can tell from pictures). If the camo don't work from up front, then it shouldn't work that much from far back as well.
|
|
