|
|
Post by systema on Dec 13, 2009 20:01:43 GMT -5
 - Systema m733 PTW
- Surefire M500A
- EOtech 553
- EOtech M-16/AR-15 Carry Handle Mount
- Blackhawk Universal Single Point Sling Adapter
- Blackhawk Storm Sling XT
- KWA M9 PTP
- TM USP AEP
|
|
Ocelot
New Member
FHU
Posts: 841
|
Post by Ocelot on Dec 13, 2009 20:30:30 GMT -5
I never thought a Systema owner would put on his carry handle rail adapter on backwards. Fail points +1.
Other than that, looks good. Not sure if I like the look of an EOtech on top of a carry handle, but its fine.
|
|
|
|
Post by Reaper6 on Dec 13, 2009 20:37:49 GMT -5
Um....take a closer look...I don't think that particular one is on backwards. It just looks off. Look at the line between the rail itself and the top of the carry handle. It's wider at the front than at the back. I suspect it wouldn't fit into the carry handle groove if reversed.
|
|
Ocelot
New Member
FHU
Posts: 841
|
Post by Ocelot on Dec 13, 2009 20:40:29 GMT -5
I've been proven wrong. Sorry, my bad. Fail points on my side I have nothing else to say.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tollis on Dec 13, 2009 20:52:11 GMT -5
Very nice gun, can't wait to see it again at phoenix.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dahm on Dec 13, 2009 21:22:15 GMT -5
I really don't think the EOTech mounted on top of the carry handle is the correct solution. Try one of these:  |
|
|
|
Post by systema on Dec 13, 2009 22:59:48 GMT -5
That rail will not work because of the M500. That was my first instinct as well but I soon found out it was a no go after purchasing the EOtech one and trying it out. The carry handle mount also makes it possible to wear a full face mask without target acquisition becoming a problem.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dahm on Dec 13, 2009 23:30:05 GMT -5
I could see how that M500 could get in the way, but there's gotta be another option. In a real scenario that rifle wouldn't be accurate at long range due to the massive height difference in your bullet exit point and your dot.
But that is pretty cool that you got your hands on one of the acclaimed M733 PTW's.
|
|
|
|
Post by Great Troub of Troubistan on Dec 14, 2009 2:20:57 GMT -5
That rifle looks like it'd be designed for close-quarters anyways Dahm. Either way, I also dislike having sights that high up. Lower the better.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deadpocketss on Dec 14, 2009 17:28:02 GMT -5
I agree with Troub, I hate raised sights.
|
|
|
|
Post by systema on Dec 26, 2009 3:22:10 GMT -5
I've decided that I'm going to replace the receiver with Prime CNC Noveske receiver. I really like this setup. Perhaps eventually Ill turn her into something similar. Although I really like the m500 so we'll see. One thing I would like to do in terms of measurable objectives is to decrease the weight. Perhaps something similar to below as well: |
|
|
|
Post by systema on Jan 1, 2010 22:04:00 GMT -5
Stay tuned for these mods:
- Vltor VIS
- Prime 7.5in outer barrel
- Prime CNC Noveske upper and lower receiver
- Madbull KX3 Amplifier
|
|
|
|
Post by systema on Jan 31, 2010 16:35:23 GMT -5
ARSENAL UPDATE Recently the metal body was replaced with a Prime CNC Noveske upper and lower.  A Systema MP5A4 has also been added to my collection.  All the weapons I currently own.  Collection: - 08 Systema m733 - 08 Systema MP5A4 - TM mp7 AEP - TM USP AEP - KWA M9 PTP m733 specs: - Prime CNC Noveske upper and lower receiver - Surefire m500A - EOTech 553 One thing I've found relatively funny is that the m733 with all the accessories weighs less than the bare bone mp5. That just seems extremely awkward to me. |
|
|
|
Post by kustom on Jan 31, 2010 16:57:36 GMT -5
Hmmm... was that 'Stema what I saw this weekend at K-zoo?
|
|
|
|
Post by systema on Jan 31, 2010 17:00:24 GMT -5
Yep
|
|
