|
Post by tormentor on Jun 2, 2009 17:13:30 GMT -5
No, we were on the second floor of one of the buildings in the city. The annoying thing was that we asked if they were woodland and they said yes. A few of them kept shooting at us even though we were screaming that we were woodland.
|
|
|
Post by canadian0314 on Jun 2, 2009 21:15:04 GMT -5
OK, Thor thats true but we signed up for the tan side, and out of the kindness of our hearts we switched to woodland. And we all have woodland bdu's.
|
|
tcp
New Member
Posts: 126
|
Post by tcp on Jun 2, 2009 21:29:48 GMT -5
Haha i think i was with you tormentor, when that went down. It was funny that after both sides knew who each other were, some of the woodland guys in the tower started shooting back. We were doing the best of the whole day when woodland was fighting a civil war and fighting the tan, after all the woodland was working together, we sucked it up.
|
|
|
Post by Koko on Jun 2, 2009 23:18:36 GMT -5
You did not "seen" them, you "saw" them. Or you "have seen" them, though just saying you "saw" them is probably better. Sorry, the Grammar Nazi in me wouldn't let that go. Actually in that context he would have used "had seen" and not "have seen" as it was in reference to a single point in the past. If you are going to correct someone you should probably make sure you have your grammar knowledge down
|
|
|
Post by Kiki on Jun 2, 2009 23:56:53 GMT -5
Meh, regardless the best way to say it would have been to say that he "saw" them.
Also, he wasn't necessarily speaking about a single event in the past. It's hard to tell for sure, but he said "I also seen somebody with an actual video camcorder" which could mean he saw that person once, in which he could say "I had seen". However, he also could've meant that he saw the person multiple times throughout the day, in which he could say "I have seen". Although I still think a better way to say it would have been "I saw" or "I remember having seen".
|
|
|
Post by Koko on Jun 3, 2009 11:24:04 GMT -5
Even in reference to a single day you would more than likely use "had" as it's just more grammatically appropriate...
|
|
lonewolf
New Member
FAC-ET-SPERA
Posts: 412
|
Post by lonewolf on Jun 3, 2009 15:14:39 GMT -5
Big thanks to SFOD for hosting another great event. Thanks for having FAH out and we will see you on the 14th.
|
|
|
Post by Kiki on Jun 3, 2009 15:32:25 GMT -5
Even in reference to a single day you would more than likely use "had" as it's just more grammatically appropriate... I still believe it could have gone both ways, though "saw" was still more appropriate than either "had" or "have".
|
|
|
Post by Phantom G3 on Jun 3, 2009 15:38:20 GMT -5
It's English, it's a c0mpl3x l4ngu4g3...
|
|
|
Post by Guts and Glory on Jun 3, 2009 16:14:00 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Phantom G3 on Jun 3, 2009 16:46:58 GMT -5
Nice review. Man, did I also love the bum rushes, so much adrenaline, so little time.
|
|
|
Post by psvoorheis on Jun 3, 2009 17:01:55 GMT -5
But just enough to get a bead on you guys as you entered the city.
|
|
|
Post by Phantom G3 on Jun 3, 2009 17:06:31 GMT -5
Which made the rush better, getting shot! What a sight to see, most of the guys rushing in, and then being taken out. Made the arenaline rush even better!
|
|
|
Post by kustom on Jun 3, 2009 18:01:47 GMT -5
I'd like to know who FAH was duking it out with on the hill. In both the city games, and tan defending D-Day, we hunted the hill and got into some nice action. There was a point where the green team got Hatemonger, Scorch, and Kulprit out within a few seconds, and then tried to come in after a ref passed by on the trail, not realising I was still there. Also, for the 6-7 guys that were out of bounds, when WarPig moved you back in, you should have taken cover when he said to... I've never gotten 6-7 people in one burst before. Lots of fun.
|
|
|
Post by Connors on Jun 3, 2009 19:22:51 GMT -5
I know CQBR wasn't the only one with a camera out there....
I demands moar pics!
|
|