|
Post by big1711 on Mar 26, 2009 14:58:52 GMT -5
I was wondering if there was anybody who knew of a company that is selling a nice magnifying acog scope. One with crosshairs no red dots.
|
|
|
Post by Psychosis on Mar 26, 2009 15:03:56 GMT -5
Trijicon.
|
|
|
Post by Thor on Mar 26, 2009 15:19:14 GMT -5
FTW. Now, if you mean airsoft replicas, I believe G&P makes a nice 4x ACOG.
|
|
|
Post by cqbr on Mar 26, 2009 16:13:07 GMT -5
What Psychosis said. www.trijicon.comGo Big or Go Home! I have nothing else to say
|
|
|
Post by freeman(Immortal) on Mar 27, 2009 14:41:20 GMT -5
I got one same like you on Airsoftsmith.com. They said that make from Star.
|
|
|
Post by Judge on Mar 28, 2009 22:44:55 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Dahm on Mar 29, 2009 10:03:54 GMT -5
I think when it comes to 4x replica ACOG's its hard to go wrong. Think about it..
What they all do: - Zoom 4 times - Have attractive shell
They all are going to have shitty eye relief, so why spend then extra hundo' on a G&P. I've used a few ACM* ones before and to be quite honest, if you're not ready to shell out for a $900-$1100 Trijicon, just get one of these. I've never technically used a G&P before, but here are a few reasons why I know the difference isn't worth it.
- Read about 15 reviews, all saying the G&P eye relief was poor, but the scope was clear - Handed my ACM 4x ACOG (Didn't know it was ACM at the time) to Judge, and he thought it was G&P. Later I found out it really was ACM. - Was very satisfied with the clarity of the ACM, but also had shitty eye relief
In the end its up to you, if you want a good G&P name, drop the $200 on one. If you just want a moderate 4x scope that has the look and feel of an ACOG, drop $96 + shipping on an ACM type (that price reflects the TA31 style).
*ACM = China Copy - sometimes named that on HK sites
|
|
|
Post by Ghast on Mar 30, 2009 3:59:24 GMT -5
ACM = All China Made
|
|
|
Post by crazyrabbit on Mar 30, 2009 6:44:38 GMT -5
Well Judges G&P has shity eye relief, but Roughnecks had pretty good eye relief. I don't know if it was because Judges was an older model or what.
|
|