|
|
Post by Tollis on Dec 31, 2008 15:57:53 GMT -5
Well, I want to get a helmet for my multicam loadout, I was thinking either a Mich 2002 or an IBH. Which one would look better?
|
|
|
|
Post by Big Boss on Dec 31, 2008 17:27:07 GMT -5
I think the MICH with a balaclava would make you look pretty bad ass. I just don't like how the IBH style helmets expose your, ENTIRE ear, and I heard some of the replica IBH helmets have really bad chinstraps, but at the same time so do some of the MICH replicas. Make sure you do some researching on which ones have better chinstraps.
|
|
|
|
Post by Crazyman™ on Dec 31, 2008 21:42:08 GMT -5
Balaclavas are lame with most camo loadouts. As for helmets, I'm not much of a fan of them. They're clunky when you're running around. That's why I got rid of the helmets I had.
|
|
|
|
Post by GrinchBiscuit on Dec 31, 2008 22:41:41 GMT -5
Balaclavas are lame with most camo loadouts. Madness!  But to keep it on topic, get a MICH replica. IBH chinstraps suck donkey peen, and there are no aftermarket chinstraps to alleviate the problem. Well, there is one way to alleviate the problem, go out and buy a real ILC Dover IBH, for a measly sum of 2G's. |
|
|
|
Post by Tollis on Jan 1, 2009 23:16:44 GMT -5
Okay thanks for the input guys.
|
|
