dusty
New Member
Posts: 384
|
Post by dusty on Sept 12, 2007 16:05:03 GMT -5
As some may know I'm am very cheap when it comes to my gear. I'm cheap because I don't see what good a $200 plate carrier is going to do someone in airsoft. However many claim that paying more for good gear is worth it because it will last for years, and it is very high quality. I on the other hand would say that it is better to spend less on individual pieces of gear because it allows you money to create more than one setup, and airsoft doesn't give gear nearly as much wear as real life use. For example, I just bought a new utg MARPAT crossdraw (check the gallery in a few days for pics) for $47, and although many say utg gear is low quality and will fall apart, I've never had any problems with me previous black utg crossdraw, which I've had for years.
Opinions?
|
|
|
Post by Jumprefusal on Sept 12, 2007 16:13:22 GMT -5
For airsoft, expensive gear isn't necessary but the problem comes with looks. If you want something specific that you see in the sandbox, 9 times out of 10 there is no replica or the replica is almost as much. I recommend if buying cheap gear, buy it from someplace in the states. Usually that means you can return it, or it has a warranty and the retailers reputation is on the line. China retailers have nothing to lose, and will point and laugh at their computer when you send them threatening emails.
|
|
|
Post by easy1 on Sept 12, 2007 18:37:08 GMT -5
all the gear i use for airsoft isn't so much for looks(although it helps),i use it for practicability. it's all used surplus and just being at the right place at the right time finding things helps. as long as it's usefull on the field, you can find quality items online or at a retailer, mix and match and don't spend any more than you have to.
|
|
|
Post by Knife on Sept 12, 2007 19:16:03 GMT -5
I've been building a Multicam loadout for 3-4 months now, and I consider that expensive. Its worth it to me to spend extra money for Multicam and complete the look. Right now, I do have a mix match of OD and MC pouches on my gear, but thats changing. Everyone knows the age old saying that airsoft is 90% looks and 10% effectiveness. If you want to go for an impression, I say go for it. Though, I'm a bit of a geardo, so that sways my opinion.
|
|
|
Post by Яoman on Sept 12, 2007 19:26:22 GMT -5
Just because something is priced more doesnt always mean its better. Army Surplus is cheap and is durable because it was made for war. Sometimes you have to pay the extra $$ for the special look you want.
|
|
|
Post by bigc on Sept 12, 2007 20:21:50 GMT -5
I don't really care about the look, but I do care about the quality of the product. I want something that will not break in the field so I buy quality. I have bought cheap before and the stuff doesn't hold up or perform as well as the higher quality product. A person must buy the best quality you can to the point where your return does not deminish. What that statement means is that my Eagle Armor carrier is put together much better than a UTG, Eagle's customer service is better than UTG, and Eagle's quality control is better than UTG. My Eagle armor carrier was not cheap but it was not crazy expensive like a CIRAS or RAV in which I am paying for functions that I will never utilize. I am not slamming on UTG, I am just saying that Eagle was a better product for my needs and requirements. I always liked the saying just becuase it's cheap does not mean it's a good deal.
|
|
|
Post by Great Troub of Troubistan on Sept 13, 2007 13:05:59 GMT -5
The main difference between Cheap Gear, and the Gucci. Is the fact that you look more professional, and more realistic in the Gucci gear. Even in the replica Gucci gear, if you're strapped for cash.
This is MilSim, and I think you should at least try and look like a proper Soldier.
|
|
|
Post by Enkidu on Sept 13, 2007 19:55:58 GMT -5
For events that seek to have a MilSim atmosphere, I agree with TroubJig - looking the part is important. Looking the part doesn't have to mean expensive either, as Яabbit writes. If money is a factor, go with quality surplus gear. Then use that until you can save up the money for the good stuff.
A problem I come across sometimes with budding GearWhores is that they buy (new/expensive) things without ever trying them on. I realize this can be difficult, but it means a world of difference in your end satisfaction. For me, the goal is comfort, utility, durability, and looks. In that order. Generally, you won't get the first two without spending at least a moderate amount of money. You certainly won't get all four characteristics without spending a good chunk, but then you'll have exactly what you want.
By the way, when buying surplus USA gear (a good idea when looking to get my Golden Four Gear Goals at a bargain price), stay the hell away from Y-harnesses. Those things are very uncomfortable on the neck and the shoulder straps are scratchy. Hold out for surplus H-harnesses, preferable the cotton canvas ones from the Vietnam Era. You can even get long version, if you're especially tall. Totally compatible with modern gear belts, too.
|
|
|
Post by Great Troub of Troubistan on Sept 13, 2007 23:25:49 GMT -5
Why not just go with a chest rig. You can get quality ones, for cheap. I mean they may only carry magazines, and maybe some extra pouches. Their lightweight, comfortable, and gucci.
|
|
dusty
New Member
Posts: 384
|
Post by dusty on Sept 14, 2007 14:20:46 GMT -5
When I buy gear the things that are most important to me are comfort, functionality, and BA looks, in that order. Crossdraw vests fit me very well, and since I don't want to shell out the cash for a blackhawk omega vest, I pay way less for a UTG which looks better IMO and has a couple extra features. Something to mention about crossdraws is that many say the holster takes up to much space for a sidearm, and I completely agree. This is another reason to buy utg, they include an extra set of double mag pouches to replace the holster.
I also think professional looks can be achieved without spening much at all. There are many good quality plate carries and pieces of molle gear which can be had for a very low price compared to other companies. I can understand spending some extra cash to get the exact look you want if there isn't a cheap replica of the piece of gear you're looking for, but other than that I don't see the use in buying overexpensive gear.
|
|
|
Post by Great Troub of Troubistan on Sept 15, 2007 23:29:19 GMT -5
Too me. Nothing about a crossdraw vest looks bad-ass. They look like paintersoft vests to me.
|
|
dusty
New Member
Posts: 384
|
Post by dusty on Sept 18, 2007 12:17:47 GMT -5
Too me. Nothing about a crossdraw vest looks bad-ass. They look like paintersoft vests to me. Thats an issue of personal preference, I personally like them.
|
|
|
Post by Яoman on Sept 18, 2007 14:22:36 GMT -5
They remind me of hunting and just bench-shooting vests with the reinforced shoulder But yes thats a personal preference.
|
|
dusty
New Member
Posts: 384
|
Post by dusty on Sept 20, 2007 16:26:17 GMT -5
See my thread in the gallery section for pics of my gear.
|
|
apache
New Member
Yeah, i've used google before
Posts: 49
|
Post by apache on Nov 29, 2007 19:08:46 GMT -5
Why not just go with a chest rig. You can get quality ones, for cheap. I mean they may only carry magazines, and maybe some extra pouches. Their lightweight, comfortable, and gucci. i hv gucci and i didn;t even know tht they made miliatary gear, i know they make dogs tags but thts about it, also there is a desinger that makes mialiatary clothes its called mui mui, though its just for looks (don't expect it to even hold mags!)
|
|