|
Post by SickPointe on Aug 11, 2002 17:37:30 GMT -5
Capatalist pig dog... ;D
Edited in the smiley there^.
|
|
|
Post by Bigmack on Aug 11, 2002 18:04:09 GMT -5
You don't count, Bigmack. Ohhh...it's on now.... Time for some G3 PAIN. ;D
|
|
|
Post by Andy on Sept 22, 2002 20:37:35 GMT -5
I only ask why? Other than the M4A1 be so commen, what other reasons do you have??
|
|
|
Post by dicepackage on Sept 22, 2002 20:43:09 GMT -5
Performance wise the ak is better because of the Version 3 mech box. It is an efficient design but hard to work on as so I am told. It has a very nice 600 round high cap if you wanna just be a bb hoser like Bigmack. The ak also can accomadate a large battery. It can handle up to a 8.6v 3000 mah battery without modification. With a little modding (3 days worth for me) you can fit a 9.6v 3000 mah battery inside. I don't know much about the M4 but I know my ak pretty well other then for the mech-box.
|
|
|
Post by Newman on Sept 22, 2002 21:06:47 GMT -5
I've worked on version 2, 3, 6 mechboxes now...anyhoo... Version 3s aren't that different from version 2 to work on, difficulty-wise. If anything, they're easier (although I love version 6, Yay!!). I still love my M4. I fit in a 9.6 1500 mAh P90 battery in the foregrip and it works perfectly...like a dream. Only problem for me is not charging it before an event and having it shoot like a low-charged 8.4... The barrel issue is not that big a deal...seriously people...I shot my M4 with 150% spring against Sting's AK with 150% and they shot...very similar. I don't think either one shot farther, at all. If barrel size is an issue, you can't make a case (in my book) of M4 medium barrel vs. AK long barrel. It's just a moot point. Just to add, my M4's accuracy is the same as Sting's AK... If you do want really high mAh batteries, you're right, the AK owns, but the M4 is right up there with 9.6 1700 mAh possible, in the original battery place. I changed my mind of AK vs. M4 and I think that both guns are pretty darn equal...once both are upgraded. Stock, the M4/XM are just shite, like the PDW/K. ;D
|
|
|
Post by Knief on Sept 22, 2002 21:33:23 GMT -5
watch it now although i did upgrade
|
|
|
Post by dicepackage on Sept 22, 2002 21:34:51 GMT -5
Version 3s aren't that different from version 2 to work on, difficulty-wise. If anything, they're easier. Maybe Redwolfs review of the ak mislead me they said it was harder then other mech-boxes.
|
|
|
Post by Newman on Sept 22, 2002 21:39:50 GMT -5
It just takes a longer time to get to the mechbox than for the M4, Dice, that's what they were probably trying to say.
|
|
WTS-Mike
New Member
Preachah Man
Former Owner of Wolverine Tactical Supply and general all around nice guy
Posts: 577
|
Post by WTS-Mike on Sept 22, 2002 21:56:44 GMT -5
M4...... ;D as far as barrel length, I have my M4B1-PDW (custom, you won't find it on WGC's site ) The M4B1-PDW has a 3" barrel and it shoots as far as a full length MP5, so it isn't a real factor AK to M4 length (not major anyway)
|
|
|
Post by Andy on Sept 23, 2002 18:36:00 GMT -5
I have a MP5, the range isn't a field use weapon. Not at all.
|
|
|
Post by dicepackage on Sept 23, 2002 18:54:36 GMT -5
It just takes a longer time to get to the mechbox than for the M4, Dice, that's what they were probably trying to say. "overall takedown is more complicated then other aegs" Doh I'm wrong again
|
|
M9Jake
New Member
Beretta M9
Posts: 50
|
Post by M9Jake on Oct 22, 2002 16:17:00 GMT -5
Personally I think the M4 is totally sweet and no other gun can surpass it except an MP5. I think the Taliban should keep their AK-47's away from us. ;D Appearance wise the M4 is much cooler in my mind.
|
|